Heather Love is professor of English at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History.
What might we learn about queer studies by exploring its intellectual debts to midcentury social scientists' interest in underdogs, underworlds, and the dynamics of stigma? Heather Love's provocative and defamiliarizing analysis asks us to see queer studies-its limitations and its transformational possibilities-anew. A critical intellectual history, teeming with ideas and unlikely engagements. * Regina Kunzel, Yale University * Underdogs is a well-crafted, subtle, and beautifully written foray into the worlds of mid-twentieth century social science by a humanities scholar who uncovers, in the fine details of descriptive empirical research, the largely unrecognized precursors of today's queer studies. With keen focus, Love reveals new possibilities for scholarly, ethical, and political commitments to the defense of outcasts and outsiders. Love makes an impassioned claim that humanists and social scientists need one another-and need to set aside the tenacious methodological dogmas that keep them apart. * Steven Epstein, Northwestern University * Underdogs clarifies how the social science of deviance, like the queer theory that superseded it, depended on the figure of the outsider. Love asks queer theory to take social science methodologies, especially 'underdog methods,' seriously. At their best, these methods promise to keep queer theory open to surprise and alert to the potentialities of everyday life. * Elizabeth Freeman, University of California, Davis * Heather Love's Underdogs: Social Deviance and Queer Theory (University of Chicago Press) is an intervention into the field of queer studies. But it is also an important work of intellectual history, tracing a surprising new genealogy that locates the origins of 1990s 'queer theory' not in literary studies, but in mid-20th-century empirical social research. It will appeal to readers invested in the nascent effort to historicise queer studies, but also to those interested in the history of the social sciences. * History Today * Underdogs seeks to rethink Queer Theory's ideological contributions through an excavation of the field's unacknowledged predecessors in the postwar social sciences. . . . [Love's] lucid prose and well-grounded interpretations make Underdogs a book that should interest readers who are immersed in Queer Theory and those who are not at all. * Gay & Lesbian Review * Underdogs presents a thorough argument for queer theorists to understand the way their problematic forebearers have left indelible marks on the field. . . . Underdogs presents a careful, close reading of deviance studies, and invites theorists and scholars to reconsider their intellectual heritage. * LSE Review of Books * This book concisely addresses the modern queer movement as Love challenges readers to critically consider that holding on to what is most valuable in queer critique may mean letting go of what is not... Highly recommended. * Choice *