Leading gender and science scholar Sarah S. Richardson charts the untold history of the idea that a woman’s health and behavior during pregnancy can have long-term effects on her descendants’ health and welfare.
The idea that a woman may leave a biological trace on her gestating offspring has long been a commonplace folk intuition and a matter of scientific intrigue, but the form of that idea—and its staggering implications for maternal well-being and reproductive autonomy—has changed dramatically over time. Beginning with the advent of modern genetics at the turn of the twentieth century, biomedical scientists dismissed any notion that a mother—except in cases of extreme deprivation or injury—could alter her offspring’s traits. Consensus asserted that a child’s fate was set by a combination of its genes and post-birth upbringing.  
Over the last fifty years, however, this consensus was dismantled, and today, research on the intrauterine environment and its effects on the fetus is emerging as a robust program of study in medicine, public health, psychology, evolutionary biology, and genomics. Collectively, these sciences argue that a woman’s experiences, behaviors, and physiology can have life-altering effects on offspring development. Tracing a genealogy of ideas about heredity and maternal-fetal effects, The Maternal Imprint offers a critical analysis of conceptual and ethical issues provoked by the striking rise of epigenetics and fetal origins science in postgenomic biology today.
								
								
							
							
								
								
							
						
					 				
				 
			
			
				
					
	By:   
	
Sarah S. Richardson
	
	Imprint:   University of Chicago Press
	
Country of Publication:   United States
	
Dimensions:  
	
		Height: 229mm, 
	
	
	
		Width: 152mm, 
	
	
		Spine: 23mm
	
	
	
		
Weight:   513g
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
	
	ISBN:   9780226544779
	ISBN 10:   022654477X
	
Pages:   376
	
Publication Date:   08 November 2021
	
	Audience:  
	
		
		
		Professional and scholarly
	
		
		, 
		
		
		Undergraduate
	
	
	
Format:   Hardback
	
	Publisher's Status:   Active
				
 
			 
			
		    
			    
				    
						1. Introduction: The Maternal Imprint  2. Sex Equality in Heredity  3. Prenatal Culture  4. Germ Plasm Hygiene  5. Maternal Effects  6. Race, Birth Weight, and the Biosocial Body  7. Fetal Programming  8. It’s the Mother!  9. Epilogue: Gender and Heredity in the Postgenomic Moment  Acknowledgments  Notes  References  Index   
				    
			    
		    
		    
			
				
					
					
						Sarah S. Richardson is professor of the history of science and of studies of women, gender, and sexuality at Harvard University. She directs the Harvard GenderSci Lab and is the author of Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome, also published by the University of Chicago Press. 
					
				 
			 
			
			
				
				
					
						
							Reviews for The Maternal Imprint: The Contested Science of Maternal-Fetal Effects
							
								
									
									
									
										
											A rich, elegantly argued analysis of the long history of scientific and popular thinking about 'maternal effects' on the fetuses that women gestate, full of well-articulated plunges into the archives of scientific texts and journals in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This is an important, beautifully researched, and well-written book by an author whose prior works have literally changed their fields.  -- Rayna Rapp, New York University  Richardson provides a detailed historical and sociological narrative, spanning the period from pre-Weismann concepts of heritability to modern day epigenetics. Although Weismann's work paved the way for the Modern Synthesis, its emphasis on a disposable soma led him to challenge the very legitimacy of research into maternal influences and prenatal culture. Modern epigenetics research appears to address this challenge. Richardson's gender analysis of peer-reviewed science reveals that epigenetics is not just the newest cutting-edge, pro-social, plasticity-favoring, anti-genetic, and anti-reductionist field to emerge from modern molecular genetics. Rather, it is also the 'vector' of newly problematic images and social roles that limit women and diminish the status of pregnancy and motherhood, in ways that are disturbingly similar to nineteenth century societal notions of women's roles. Richardson's exquisitely documented arguments are of compelling interest to all with an interest in the complex interface of science and society.  -- Michael J. Wade, Indiana University