WIN $150 GIFT VOUCHERS: ALADDIN'S GOLD

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

Law Across Imperial Borders

British Consuls and Colonial Connections on China’s Western Frontiers, 1880-1943

Emily Whewell

$183.99

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Manchester University Press
19 December 2019
Law across imperial borders offers new perspectives on the complex legal connections between Britain's presence in Western China in the western frontier regions of Yunnan and Xinjiang, and the British colonies of Burma and India. Bringing together a transnational methodology with a social-legal focus, it demonstrates how inter-Asian mobility across frontiers shaped British authority in contested frontier regions of China. It examines the role of a range of actors who helped create, constitute and contest legal practice on the frontier-including consuls, indigenous elites and cultural mediators. The book will be of interest to historians of China, the British Empire in Asia and legal history. -- .
By:  
Imprint:   Manchester University Press
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 234mm,  Width: 156mm,  Spine: 16mm
Weight:   513g
ISBN:   9781526140029
ISBN 10:   1526140020
Series:   Studies in Imperialism
Pages:   216
Publication Date:  
Audience:   General/trade ,  College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  ELT Advanced ,  Primary
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active

Emily Whewell is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt

Reviews for Law Across Imperial Borders: British Consuls and Colonial Connections on China’s Western Frontiers, 1880-1943

'Law across imperial borders significantly enriches our understanding of the British consular presence in frontier China, and it consequently will interest different audiences. Scholars of the British Empire will find a study of colonial law expanding beyond its borders. For historians of Chinese borderlands, Whewell clarifies and greatly nuances the vicissitudes of British interests and their institutional and political contexts.' Eric Schluessel, American Journal of Legal History -- .


See Also