The Reparable and the Irreparable

Based on a philosophical approach, the book offers a brilliant panorama, both precise and synthetic, of the meanings that can be given to the notion of reparation in different fields (psychology, biology, law, philosophy especially). It thus offers a unique way for thinking transversally about the possibilities and limits of repairability, and should therefore be of interest to specialists in many disciplines.--Nicolas Dodier, EHESS Paris The Reparable and the Irreparable is vital reading for the present time. How do we respond to the multiple experiences of damage, degradation and loss that permeate our lives? Johann Michel shows that the work of repair is an essential feature of the human condition that cuts across the natural, mental, legal and socio-political aspects of life. If we are constantly engaged in the work of mending and making amends, how might these different registers of repair shed light on one another and enhance our efforts? How also might they inform our understanding of the limits of repair and the challenge of the irreparable? The question of the irreparable, which Michel poses with fresh insight, matters now more than ever.--Scott Davidson, West Virginia University Johann Michel's The Reparable and the Irreparable offers incisive insight for the vital contemporary discussion of reparations. The book broadens and deepens discussion through a mode of analogy that compares and contrasts social and political reparation to other dimensions of repair, including biological, psychological, sociological, moral, religious, and legal forms. The text is unsparing in describing the limits of repair, in both the irreparable - injury that cannot be undone - and what it calls the a-reparable - injury that is irreducible to quantitative, especially monetary, calculation. The book offers a significant anthropological examination of the human condition in the context of repair in which readers benefit from how the author draws upon diverse fields that are astutely illuminated by his distinctive perspective as both a social philosopher and social scientist.--George Taylor, University of Pittsburgh