WIN $150 GIFT VOUCHERS: ALADDIN'S GOLD

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

$210

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Oxford University Press
28 September 2020
The Law of Armed Conflict is usually understood to be a regime of exception that applies only during armed conflict and regulates hostilities among enemies. It assigns privileges to states far beyond what they are allowed to do in peacetime, and it mandates certain protections for non-combatants, which can often be defeated by appeals to military necessity or advantage.

The Laws of War in International Thought examines the intellectual history of the laws of war before their codification. It reconstructs the processes by which political and legal theorists built the laws' distinctive vocabularies and legitimized some of their broadest permissions, and it situates these processes within the broader intellectual project that from early modernity spelled out the nature, function, and powers of state sovereignty.

The book focuses on four historical moments in the intellectual history of the laws of war: the doctrine of just war in Spanish scholasticism; Hugo Grotius's theory of solemn war; the Enlightenment theory of regular war; and late nineteenth-century humanitarianism. By looking at these moments, Pablo Kalmanovitz shows how challenging and polemical it has been for international theorists to justify the exceptional and permissive character of the laws of war. In this way, he contributes to recover a sense of the historical foundations and many still problematic aspects of the Law of Armed Conflict.
By:  
Imprint:   Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 241mm,  Width: 163mm,  Spine: 19mm
Weight:   480g
ISBN:   9780198790259
ISBN 10:   0198790252
Series:   The History and Theory of International Law
Pages:   208
Publication Date:  
Audience:   Professional and scholarly ,  Undergraduate
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Introduction 1: Political Theology, Ius Gentium, and Just War in Spanish Scholasticism 2: Hugo Grotius on Solemn War and the Difference Sovereignty Makes 3: Regular War and Resort to Force in the Enlightenment 4: Enlightenment Ideals of Limited Warfare 5: Humanizing War in the 19th Century

Pablo Kalmanovitz is research professor at the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE) in Mexico City.

Reviews for The Laws of War in International Thought

Kalmanovitz's superbly argued study covers and impressive wealth of material from Spanish scholasticism to nineteenth-century humanitarianism. There is no other study which puts the laws of war so competently at the heart of international thought. Kalmanovitz provides a fresh look on canonical authors, offering in the process new interpretations of theories of just war, solemn war, and regular war in intellectual history. * Peter Schroder, University College London * This book takes the study of the historical and theoretical foundations of the modern laws of war onto a new plane. Insightful, judicious, and learned, Kalmanovitz's study is now the indispensable starting point for understanding our current approach to regulating war. And it is essential for pondering whether the fears of our ancestors that drove regulation have been incurred-and their fondest hopes fulfilled. * Samuel Moyn, Yale University * Kalmanovitz painstakingly reconstructs the dilemmas confronted by influential figures in the development of the modern laws of war, and reveals their persistent entanglement within a politics of statecraft that legitimizes state violence. This is an exciting, rigorous, and original contribution that exposes the historical roots of contempotary predicaments faced by those who seek to humanize war through laws of war. * Catherine Lu, McGill University * By re-reading the literary tradition, Pablo Kalmanovitz shows how the balance between military necessity and humanity in the modern laws of war arose from the realization that sovereign statehood needs to be protected. The formalization of regular war appears both as a hypocritical veil over sovereign violence and an effort to open the way for prudential statesmanship. This is a sharp and intelligent historical analysis of the difficulties and paradoxes of responsible statesmanship and the limits of law in a violent world. * Martti Koskenniemi, University of Helsinki *


See Also