The Jury Under Fire: Myth, Controversy, and Reform

— —

Brian H. Bornstein (Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law, University of Nebraska - Lincoln) Edie Greene (Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs)

The Jury Under Fire

Myth, Controversy, and Reform

Brian H. Bornstein (Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law, University of Nebraska - Lincoln), Edie Greene (Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs)

$177.95

Paperback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

Availability Information

We source books from suppliers in Australia and overseas. For books we don't currently have in stock, the time it takes to get them from our suppliers can vary widely - from a few days to a few months - so we check each book with each supplier to determine the expected time it will take to be supplied to us.

We then advise you accordingly. If the time taken to get any book is too long for you, you can let us know and we will cancel or adjust your order, and refund as required.

To find out the anticipated arrival time for specific items prior to ordering, please contact us by phone or email:

Phone +61 2 9264 3111, or 1800 4 BOOKS (1800 4 26657) if outside Sydney:
option 1 Abbey's Bookshop (Crime, History, Science, Kids & more) • info@abbeys.com.au
option 2 Language Book Centre (ESL & Foreign Languages) • language@abbeys.com.au
option 3 Galaxy Bookshop (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Romance, Graphic Novels) • sf@galaxybooks.com.au

QTY:

English

Oxford University Press Inc
01 March 2017

Social, group or collective psychology; Judicial powers; Civil procedure: law of evidence

Series: American Psychology-Law Society Series

Although the jury is often referred to as one of the bulwarks of the American justice system, it regularly comes under attack. Recent changes to trial procedures, such as reducing jury size, allowing non-unanimous verdicts, and rewriting jury instructions in plain English, were designed to promote greater efficiency and adherence to the law. Other changes, such as capping damages and replacing jurors with judges as arbiters in complex trials, seem designed to restrict the role of laypeople in trial outcomes. Whether these innovations are implemented to facilitate the administration of justice or due to the belief that juries have excessive power and make irrational decisions, they raise a host of questions about their effects on juries' judgments and about justice. Policymakers sometimes make incorrect assumptions about jury behavior, with the result that some reform efforts have had surprising and unintended consequences.

The Jury Under Fire reviews a number of controversial beliefs about juries as well as the implications of these views for jury reform. It reviews up-to-date research on both criminal and civil juries that uses a variety of research methodologies: simulations, archival analyses, field studies, and juror interviews. Each chapter focuses on a mistaken assumption or myth about jurors or juries, critiques these myths, and then uses social science research findings to suggest appropriate reforms. Chapters discuss the experience of serving as a juror; jury selection and jury size; and the impact of evidence from eyewitnesses, experts, confessions, and juvenile offenders. The book also covers the process of deciding damages and punishment and the role of emotions in jurors' decision making, and it compares jurors' and judges' decisions. Finally, it reviews a broad range of efforts to reform the jury, including the most promising reforms that have a solid backing in research. Featuring highly visible trials to illustrate key points, The Jury Under Fire will interest researchers in psychology and the law, practicing attorneys, and policymakers, as well as students and trainees in these areas.

By: Brian H. Bornstein (Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law University of Nebraska - Lincoln), Edie Greene (Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs)
Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions: Height: 234mm, Width: 163mm, Spine: 23mm
Weight: 580g
ISBN: 9780190201340
ISBN 10: 0190201347
Series: American Psychology-Law Society Series
Pages: 416
Publication Date: 01 March 2017
Audience: Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate
Format: Paperback
Publisher's Status: Active

Series Foreword Acknowledgments Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Avoid Jury Duty at All Costs Chapter 3. Jury Selection Can Effectively Identify Biased Jurors Chapter 4. 6 = 12 and They Don't All Have to Agree Chapter 5. Jurors Can Distinguish Accurate from Inaccurate Eyewitnesses Chapter 6. Jurors Can Distinguish True from False Confessions Chapter 7. Jurors Overvalue Expert Testimony Chapter 8. Jurors Treat Juvenile Defendants Fairly Chapter 9. Compensatory Damage Awards Are Excessive and Unpredictable Chapter 10. Punitive Damage Awards Are Excessive and Unpredictable Chapter 11. Jurors in Criminal Cases Can Fairly Punish Wrongdoers Chapter 12. Jurors Can Control Their Emotions Chapter 13. Just Let the Judge Do It Chapter 14. Jurors Don't Need Any Special Help Chapter 15. Conclusion References About the Authors Index

Brian H. Bornstein, PhD, is Professor of Psychology and Courtesy Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where he serves as Director of the country's oldest Law and Psychology Program. His research interests include jury decision making, the reliability of eyewitness memory, and the application of decision-making principles to everyday judgment tasks. Edie Greene, PhD, is Professor of Psychology, Director of Psychological Sciences Training, and Director of the Graduate Sub-Plan in Psychology and Law at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. Her research focuses on legal decision making, beliefs about the causes and consequences of crime, eyewitness memory, and psychological issues in elder law.

Reviews for The Jury Under Fire: Myth, Controversy, and Reform

Bornstein and Greene debunk more than a dozen popular myths-which often double as legal assumptions-about juries and how they function, interweaving descriptions of notable jury trials with scientific research testing whether these assumptions have merit. Engaging in style and thoroughly researched, this book is a 'must read' for anyone with an interest in jury decision making and is sure to become required reading in any class examining the jury. --Margaret Bull Kovera, PhD, Presidential Scholar and Professor of Psychology, John Jay College, City University of New York This book is a welcome addition to the field. The authors use the most up-to-date findings to critically evaluate several myths about jury decision making. The chapters are presented in a fair and unbiased manner, making for an exceptionally clever and well-thought out book. This book adds something original to the field and will be a tremendous benefit for social scientists interested in juries and jury decision making. --Jeffrey Neuschatz, PhD, Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama in Huntsville The book skillfully interweaves cogent summaries of legal principles or important forensic issues, such as the psychology of eyewitness accuracy or false confession, with research into how juries grapple with these topics. --PsycCRITIQUES