SALE ON YALE! History • Biography & more... TELL ME MORE

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

The Future in the Past

Reconstructing Article 109(3) of the UN Charter Towards The San Francisco Promise to Constitutionalise...

Shahr-Yar M Sharei

$137.95   $109.99

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Center for United Nations Constitutional Research, Brussels
11 February 2025
Failed Global State

A state without a government is called a failed state. Chaos, injustice and armed conflict being rampant. Recent reminders are Congo, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. And all war theaters, including Gaza and Ukraine.

As the UN is not a world government, global governance is left to international law. This is characterized as having no hierarchy, little judicial independence or due process of law, and no supreme or appeals court, unlike what we would expect from national laws.

While the 'peoples' are subjects of law, they are not allowed to be lawmakers or interlocutors. According to UN law, the P5 of the Security Council, weaponized by the veto, at their choosing, in any decision, can be above the law.

The colossal failure of the UNSC has been in keeping the peace. Considering the armed conflicts and genocides since World War II, the cumulative death toll is estimated at 70 million, exceeding the military casualty of WW2. According to UNHRC, we now have a record 120 million war refugees, more than ever before in history.

Wars injure indiscriminately, impacting our animals, plants, and the environment. With hundreds of millions of tons of CO2 annually generated by militaries, wars fuel the climate crisis. Even when we are not fighting, we spend $2.2 trillion annually or 250 million dollars an hour on the military, which, if used, will cause havoc and, if unused, is still a monumental waste of talent and resources.

Wars are being taken to outer space, where a limited nuclear explosion could kill most satellites - indiscriminately knocking down our GPS, internet, weather and communication satellites. Two recent resolutions at the Council, one on non-proliferation of nukes, and the other on complete demilitarization of space, including nukes, were both killed because of P5 No votes.

During the Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Gaza wars so far, we have had at least 7 vetoes by two of the P5 permanents. Each veto has meant no end to war, no 'ceasefire, ' or even a 'pause, ' stealing the hope of peace for the affected and the inflicted.

International law, stuck in its 1600s Westphalian European origins of state-centric absolute sovereigns, does not recognize the people as the planet's sovereigns. In the fragmented IL, during wars, both sides extensively refer to the ""International Humanitarian Law,"" one of the bits of international law, to justify their actions. Whereas IHL is the ""law of war,"" in other words, the legalization of what is considered acceptable killing, torture, taking captives, and forcing migration.

The Future in the Past

With all the good it does, the UN is a WW2 architecture with the Security Council at its apex. The Council is not only intra-vires in war and peace but sees all collective security in its competency. While the Council has proven incompetent in stopping wars, it has also been stagnant when it comes to the global existential threats posed by climate change, pandemics, food security, outer space, and AI.

Being state-centric rather than responsible for the global commons, a 2022 Council climate change resolution advanced by Germany and the EU, as an existential threat to promote more concrete action by states to meet their mitigation targets, was torpedoed by a single P5 No vote. Putting in doubt the sustainability of our fragile planet.

Being aware of the insecurity risks of the Security Council and believing the United Nations is a work in progress, the 1945 Anti-Veto Rebels gifted us the key to the transformation of the UN: the Charter review and upgrade - the change process and gateway we have never tried before to make the UN 2.0 possible. This research builds a legal case for upholding the San Francisco Promise of Article 109 (3), constructing a social contract between the United Nations states and planetary citizens.
By:  
Imprint:   Center for United Nations Constitutional Research, Brussels
Dimensions:   Height: 229mm,  Width: 152mm,  Spine: 29mm
Weight:   835g
ISBN:   9798991184502
Pages:   456
Publication Date:  
Audience:   General/trade ,  ELT Advanced
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active

S.M. Sharei, PhD in International Law, is a principal in the UN Charter, Global Governance, and International Constitutional Law. Sharei co-founded the Center for United Nations Constitutional Research, specializing in research and policy recommendations on international legislation-driven governance of AI, climate change, the Security Council and UN reform.

Reviews for The Future in the Past: Reconstructing Article 109(3) of the UN Charter Towards The San Francisco Promise to Constitutionalise the United Nations and International Law

What the stakeholders said atThe San Francisco Anti-Veto RebellionIf a great power could cast a cloak of protection over a small aggressor power by the exercise of the right of veto, then the work of the Security Council would be reduced to complete futility. -Peter Fraser, Prime Minister, New Zealand The Charter is the greatest document of its kind that has ever been formulated. -Tom Connally, Chair of the US Senate on Foreign Relations and the UNCIO Chair on Security Council, the USA If unanimity really existed among the great powers the veto was superfluous. Furthermore, the veto might help to bring on war through lack of action by the Council. The Cuban Delegation wanted not only world order but world justice. -Guillermo Belt Ramirez, Head of Delegation, Cuba The veto was contrary to the principle of equality of nations expressed in the Preamble of the Charter...'constitutional revision' is a must. -Dr. Bertha Lutz, one of only 6 women in 200+ delegates with voting rights, Brazil The United Nations is 'no enchanted palace'. -Lord Halifax, The Acting Chairman, the UK If this unanimity rule were not to be applied at the end of ten years to any proposal regarding the amendment of the Charter, we could safely, and with complete trust and confidence in the five great powers, agree to the complete Yalta formula during the intervening period of ten years. -Ramaswami Mudaliar, Chief Delegate, India In drawing this Charter, we have recognized that it must be flexible-that we must be able to undo later anything which proves unworkable or clumsy in new circumstances, or to readjust particular features of the Organization to the happier world which we believe a lasting peace will bring into being. Francis Forde, Prime Minister, Australia The proposed Council is a 'quasi-judicial' organ that mixes the jury, the judge, and the executioner. -Eelco van Kleffens, FM, Netherlands Charter, a world order in which the mice could be stamped out but in which the lion would not be restrained. -Ezequiel Padilla, FM, Mexico 'Yes, ' I went on; 'You can say you defeated the veto...But you can also say, we tore up the charter!' At that point, I sweepingly ripped the charter draft in my hands to shreds and flung the scraps with disgust on the table. The delegates fell silent, while I stared belligerently at one face after another. -Senator Tom Connally, Autobiography, USA The great majority of the countries represented in this Conference, however, do share the fears of Colombia and of Cuba...as our negative vote. -Lleras Camargo, FM, Colombia After a time, the great powers would be willing to consider elimination of the veto. -T. V. Soong, Minister for Foreign Affairs, China In memory of President Roosevelt at the Tehran Conference, Iran has proposed amendments to the Charter to make ICJ jurisdiction obligatory and replace the Council veto with a two-thirds majority vote. -Mostafa Adle-Justice Minister, Iran Belgium believed that providing for a 'full examination' of the Charter in a review conference would demonstrate that the opportunity for reform exists. -Paul-Henri Spaak, FM, Belgium What was called the veto of the great powers is certainly not in keeping with the legal ideal, which we do not despair, will someday be established by common accord between peoples. -Georges Bidault, FM, France


See Also