Marco Antonio Andreacchio was awarded a doctorate from the University of IIllinois for his interpretation of Sino-Japanese philosophical classics in dialogue with Western counterparts and a doctorate from Cambridge University for his work on Dante’s Platonic interpretation of religious authority. Andreacchio has taught at various higher education institutions and published systematically on problems of a political-philosophical nature.
""Mr. Andreacchio’s book offers a sophisticated approach of both historical and contemporary interest, including a careful examination of its original sources in defense of the meaningfulness of creation and freedom. While the questions explored are certainly both timely and lasting (we were debating them one thousand years ago, and still are today), the arguments articulated on the way respond vigorously to modern philosophy’s objections to medieval scholarship, tilting the balance in the latter’s favor. The author shows himself to be eminently qualified to confront his task, giving solid evidence of outstanding scholarship as he exposes the marrow of cardinal medieval writings, and advancing illuminating interpretations devoid of any discernible errors, factual or otherwise."" -Prof. Kenneth Hart Green, University of Toronto, Canada ""Here we find the main thesis of the text substantiated, since in it the articulation of artistic production and ontology is manifested in its full unity, a result achieved through intense work against the backdrop of a metaphysics with a clear Platonic bent.... we can say without any hesitation that it deserves to be the object of attention by anyone interested in the topics it addresses, in particular creation and freedom, but also anyone interested in the history of ideas and the way in which the modern era confronts this other historical moment of which it is heir, even though it has not been uncommon for it to unhesitantly show profound ingratitude. For our part, we have no doubt in recommending its reading..."" -José Guilherme B. A. Sutil, Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 33(65):165-166