Marco Roscini is Professor of International Law at the University of Westminster and Swiss Chair of International Humanitarian Law at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. He has a PhD in International Law from Sapienza University of Rome and has published widely in the field of international security law.
Roscini (law, Univ. of Westminster, England) has compiled an extensive review of thinking about the principle of nonintervention in international law. His impressive research covers historical, theoretical, and systemic factors. The book is a veritable one-volume encyclopedia on the subject. * D. P. Forsythe, CHOICE * With its wealth of detail and careful scholarship, Roscini's book will surely remain an important resource for anyone seeking to understand the principle of non-intervention. It is highly recommended for lawyers, international relations specialists, and anyone interested in the history and current state of international law. * Sir Michael Wood KC, Heidelberg Journal of International Law * As the world drifts toward greater dissensus about modes of internal governance and greater distrust of cross-border projections of power, the law of non-intervention is likely to become all the more relevant. Roscini has provided a worthy guide to both its foundations and its fault lines. * Brad R. Roth, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies. * Marco Roscinis monograph offers a comprehensive account of the historical evolution of the principle of non-interference. It precisely defines the principles scope—extending beyond the mere prohibition of armed intervention—and compellingly examines its interaction with other fundamental principles and norms of international law. The authors conclusions are well-supported by a thorough analysis of relevant international practice and scholarly literature. These qualities make the work an essential resource for anyone seeking to grapple with these themes. * Alessandra Annoni, Rivista di diritto internazionale * The monograph's depth and thoroughness in collating relevant supporting documents and materials is a great accomplishment. An expansive survey of State practice, much of which has not been presented in prior scholarship, is bolstered byunderstanding gained from new statements by States made in the cyber context. The work reflects the importance of what States say about the principle of non-intervention in the cyber context, which has significant implications beyond that area of application. This excellent contribution will no doubt serve as the first port of call for any academic or practitioner looking into the subject. * Jack Kenny, International and Comparative Law Quarterly *