Fatalism and the Logic of Time

— —

Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Philosophy, University of Oklahoma)

Fatalism and the Logic of Time

Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Philosophy, University of Oklahoma)

$63.95

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

Availability Information

We source books from suppliers in Australia and overseas. For books we don't currently have in stock, the time it takes to get them from our suppliers can vary widely - from a few days to a few months - so we check each book with each supplier to determine the expected time it will take to be supplied to us.

We then advise you accordingly. If the time taken to get any book is too long for you, you can let us know and we will cancel or adjust your order, and refund as required.

To find out the anticipated arrival time for specific items prior to ordering, please contact us by phone or email:

Phone +61 2 9264 3111, or 1800 4 BOOKS (1800 4 26657) if outside Sydney:
option 1 Abbey's Bookshop (Crime, History, Science, Kids & more) • info@abbeys.com.au
option 2 Language Book Centre (ESL & Foreign Languages) • language@abbeys.com.au
option 3 Galaxy Bookshop (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Romance, Graphic Novels) • sf@galaxybooks.com.au

QTY:

English

Oxford University Press Inc
26 February 2025

Analytical philosophy & Logical Positivism; Philosophy: logic

Fatalism -- the thesis that something in the past necessitates the entire future -- is often argued for in three ways. One argument is that the truth of propositions about future events makes those events necessary. Another is that infallible divine foreknowledge necessitates all future human acts. The third is that the past history of the world in conjunction with universal causal laws necessitates the entire future. Each of these arguments depends on a premise of the necessity of the past. In Fatalism and the Logic of Time, Linda Zagzebski examines two interpretations of this necessity. One interpretation is the modal necessity of the past, and the other interpretation is the cause of closure of the past. She argues that the combination of the necessity of the past with the transfer of necessity principle is inconsistent with the truth of any proposition about the past that entails a proposition about the future. As such, the problem is much broader than fatalism. It is a problem in the logic of time.

All arrows of time, as well as the arrows of physics, arise from the human experience of before and after -- but that experience does not itself require an arrow.

By: Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy University of Oklahoma)
Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions: Height: 212mm, Width: 149mm, Spine: 18mm
Weight: 272g
ISBN: 9780197786680
ISBN 10: 0197786685
Pages: 144
Publication Date: 26 February 2025
Audience: General/trade , ELT Advanced
Format: Hardback
Publisher's Status: Active

Foreword Introduction Part One: The (incoherent) Root of Traditional Fatalist Arguments Part Two: Fatalism and the Causal Structure of Time Part Three: Does Time Have an Arrow? Works Cited

Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski is the George Lynn Cross Research Professor Emerita and Kingfisher College Chair of the Philosophy of Religion and Ethics Emerita at the University of Oklahoma. She is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities, among others. Some of her other publications include Omnisubjectivity (OUP, 2023), Epistemic Authority (OUP, 2017), Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge, 2012), and The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge (OUP, 1991).

Reviews for Fatalism and the Logic of Time

"This intriguing book, the culmination of 35 years of thinking about the problem of divine foreknowledge v. human freedom, uncovers the metaphysical bedrock beneath the surface conflict between infallibility and free will. Zagzebski argues that there is an incoherence in any argument-for causal determinism as much as for logical and theological fatalism-that posits a necessity of the past that is then transferred to the future, and this means that there's an incoherence in our understanding of time. Written in a very accessible style, Zagzebski takes the debate over arguments for fatalism in a wholly new direction. Anyone with a serious interest in the nature of time and metaphysical questions associated with it will want to read this challenging and original book."" - David Hunt, Whittier College"