THE BIG SALE IS ON! TELL ME MORE

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

Arguing About Tastes

Modeling How Context and Experience Change Economic Preferences

David Kreps

$36.95

Paperback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Columbia University Press
28 November 2023
"Mainstream economics considers individual preferences to be fixed and unchanging. Although psychologists and other social scientists explore how tastes are formed, influenced, and evolve, it is not considered ""proper"" in orthodox economics to do so. Arguing About Tastes makes the case that economists should abandon the principle that preferences are fixed and instead incorporate into their work how context and experience shape individual tastes.

David M. Kreps argues that the discipline must account for dynamic personal tastes when it comes to understanding social exchange, emphasizing human resource management and on-the-job behavior. He develops formal models that illustrate the power of intrinsic motivation and show why applying extrinsic incentives can be counterproductive. Kreps weighs the advantages and disadvantages of the principle de gustibus non est disputandum: there is no arguing about tastes. He calls for a new era of economics in which preferences are taken into account-and not for granted.

Arguing About Tastes concludes with responses by the distinguished economists Alessandra Casella and Joseph E. Stiglitz and a final reply by Kreps."

By:  
Imprint:   Columbia University Press
Country of Publication:   United States
Dimensions:   Height: 216mm,  Width: 140mm, 
ISBN:   9780231209915
ISBN 10:   0231209916
Series:   Kenneth J. Arrow Lecture Series
Pages:   216
Publication Date:  
Audience:   Professional and scholarly ,  Undergraduate
Format:   Paperback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Preface Introduction: Gary Becker on Prenups 1. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum: The Mainstream Economic Account of Individual Behavior 2. Intrinsic Motivation 3. Internalizing the Welfare of Specific Others 4. Two (or Three) Heterodox Books 5. Choice, Preference, And Utility in Dynamic Contexts 6. Some (Social) Psychology: Self-Perception and Attribution Theories 7. Intrinsic Motivation Undermined by Extrinsic Rewards? 8. Why Are “Social Promises” Unsecured? 9. The Quality of Kreps’s Performance Matters as Well 10. Intrinsic Motivation to Do What, Exactly? 11. Internalization of the Other Party’s Welfare 12. Dynamics Based on Bem’s Self-Perception Theory 13. Should Economists Move in These Directions? Commentary, Joseph E. Stiglitz Commentary, Alessandra Casella Response to the Comments Of Professors Stiglitz and Casella Appendix Notes References Index

David M. Kreps is the Adams Distinguished Professor of Management and Economics Emeritus at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. He is a leading economic theorist whose contributions span areas including choice theory, financial markets, and game theory. Among his many books are Game Theory and Economic Modeling (1990), Microeconomics for Managers (second edition, 2019), and Microeconomic Foundations I and II (2012, 2023). Kreps has received honors including the John Bates Clark Medal, the John J. Carty Award for the Advancement of Science, the Erwin Plein Nemmers Prize in Economics, and the CME Group–MSRI Prize in Innovative Quantitative Applications. Alessandra Casella is professor of economics and political science at Columbia University, where she codirects the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy. Joseph E. Stiglitz is University Professor at Columbia University and a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.

Reviews for Arguing About Tastes: Modeling How Context and Experience Change Economic Preferences

David Kreps’ Arguing About Tastes masterfully delves into the concept of endogeneity of tastes. He takes his readers on an insightful journey which challenges conventional wisdom with refreshing perspective on the dynamic forces that shape our choices. -- George Akerlof, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 2001 Arrow and Debreu told us where to go to see how reality differs from perfect markets; Kreps's book tells us how to get there by mapping out a clear route to the place where preferences are formed. -- Oriana Bandiera, The London School of Economics Kreps, a brilliant economic theorist, shows how to bring intrinsic motivation, self-perception, and identity into thinking about contracts and organization. A persuasive argument for why intrinsic motives and identity should be part of economic modeling . -- Colin Camerer, California Institute of Technology Should economists deal with tastes? Or should de gustibus non est disputandum continue to reign? In Arguing About Tastes, David Kreps compellingly argues that it is time to pay attention to the formation and transformation of tastes to increase the realism and scope of economic theory. A nuanced, critical, and eye-opening book. -- Gerd Gigerenzer, Max Planck Institute for Human Development Arguing About Tastes is a bold venture into scantily charted territory in microeconomics - the land of endogenous preferences - but I can think of no better guide than David Kreps. Professor Kreps brings energy, humor and joy to the theory-building work that make this book a pleasure to read. -- Matthew Nagler, The Graduate Center, CUNY


See Also