BONUS FREE CRIME NOVEL! PROMOTIONS

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

Intermittency

The Concept of Historical Reason in Recent French Philosophy

Andrew Gibson

$230

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Edinburgh University Press
15 March 2012
Explores the concept of historical intermittency in 5 recent French philosophers Stoking the embers of French Hegelianism, this book looks at five recent and contemporary French philosophers: Badiou, Jambet, Lardreau, Franoise Proust and Rancire. Each produces a post-Hegelian philosophy of history founded on an assertion of the intermittency of historical value.
* a sustained reflection on the character of a contemporary philosophy of history
* a new and timely theory of modernity, modern literature and artKey words: Badiou; Rancire; Franoise Proust; Jambet; Lardreau; modern literature; post-Marxism; intermittency; contemporary political thought; French philosophy.
By:  
Imprint:   Edinburgh University Press
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 234mm,  Width: 156mm,  Spine: 23mm
Weight:   665g
ISBN:   9780748637577
ISBN 10:   0748637575
Pages:   344
Publication Date:  
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Further / Higher Education
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active

Andrew Gibson is Research Professor of Modern Literature and Theory at Royal Holloway, University of London, and a member of the Conseil scientifique of the College international de philosophie in Paris. He is the author of Beckett and Badious: The Pathos of Intermittenccy (Oxford University Press, 2006), James Joyce: A Critical Life (Reaktion, 2006) and Towards a Postmodern Theory of Narrative (EUP, 1996).

Reviews for Intermittency: The Concept of Historical Reason in Recent French Philosophy

This book is to my knowledge the most subtle and original study of a crucial orientation in French philosophy that took place after the heyday of the best-known great masters, now dead (Althusser, Derrida, Foucault, Lacan etc.), but which refused to ally itself with the nouvelle philosophie (Levy, Finkielkraut and their followers). Gibson clarifies what the principal representatives of this orientation have in common, what separates them, and why thought must set out from them today, even if it preserves ? as Gibson does ? a real critical distance from them. The book is without equal or rival anywhere, including France. -- Alain Badiou Gibson is not merely a skilful interpreter of texts, not merely a passeur, who enables us to discover new vistas in contemporary French philosophy, but also a philosopher in his own right...the book you are going to read is not merely a book, it is a landmark. -- Jean-Jacques Lecercle This book is to my knowledge the most subtle and original study of a crucial orientation in French philosophy that took place after the heyday of the best-known great masters, now dead (Althusser, Derrida, Foucault, Lacan etc.), but which refused to ally itself with the nouvelle philosophie (Levy, Finkielkraut and their followers). Gibson clarifies what the principal representatives of this orientation have in common, what separates them, and why thought must set out from them today, even if it preserves ? as Gibson does ? a real critical distance from them. The book is without equal or rival anywhere, including France. Gibson is not merely a skilful interpreter of texts, not merely a passeur, who enables us to discover new vistas in contemporary French philosophy, but also a philosopher in his own right...the book you are going to read is not merely a book, it is a landmark.


See Also